![antithesis in i have a dream speech antithesis in i have a dream speech](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pVlm0K7ypuc/Ut2SspCnyHI/AAAAAAAACXk/6zUxE2exNtI/s1600/antithesis+and+parallelism.png)
King gave advice how to act and what to change currently, so his vision of the common future for the American society might come true one day:īut there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. His speech reached not only the attendant crowd, but also politicians and interested people worldwide via television and radio. King delivered his speech on the steps of Lincoln Memorial during a demonstration for jobs and freedom. Deliberative speeches are delivered to influence a decision that is made during a meeting or conference, and which concerns further actions. All of the three genres differ in their relevance in terms of time: judicial-past, epideictic-present and deliberative-future. In a judicial speech, narratio usually preceeds argumentatio. The eulogy and deliberative speech allow the orator to mix up the two parts narratio & argumentatio in terms of the strucure of a speech. The latter one and the deliberative speech have in common that the audience must give a judgement or make a decision during the speech, whereas a eulogy is delivered to please the audience. The other two genres that exist next to deliberative speech are epideictic speech, or eulogy, and the judicial speech. In terms of rhetorical genres ( genera orationis), according to the Aristoteleian classification, it is a deliberative speech ( genus deliberativum). “I have a Dream” is a political speech, which contains elements of a sermon.
![antithesis in i have a dream speech antithesis in i have a dream speech](https://img.youtube.com/vi/RIZLJMOhQCE/0.jpg)
A consecutively numbered edition of the speech is enclosed. This paper deals with “I Have a Dream”, as a post-modern political speech in terms of classical rhetoric. One year later, he was given the Nobel Peace Price. The same year after he had delivered this speech, he received the title “Man of the Year” by Time magazine. Words were his weapon and he knew how to use them. His way of persuading people was to use the power of words instead of physical violence. It was on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial where King delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.
![antithesis in i have a dream speech antithesis in i have a dream speech](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/class21-131125195218-phpapp01/95/class-21-16-638.jpg)
Subsequent mass demonstrations culminated in the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on August 28, 1963, in which more than 250,000 protesters gathered in Washington, D. President Kennedy responded to the Birmingham protests by submitting broad civil rights legislation to Congress, which led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Clashes between unarmed black demonstrators and police armed with dogs and fire hoses generated newspaper headlines throughout the world. In the spring of 1963, King and SCLC led mass demonstrations in Birmingham, Alabama, where local white police officials were known for their violent opposition to integration. Seeking to build upon the success in Montgomery, King and other southern black ministers founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in 1957. In December 1956, the United States Supreme Court declared Alabama's segregation laws unconstitutional and Montgomery buses were desegregated. The boycott continued throughout 1956 and King gained national prominence for his role in the campaign. On December 5, 1955, after civil rights activist Rosa Parks refused to comply with Montgomery's segregation policy on buses, black residents launched a bus boycott and elected King president of the newly-formed Montgomery Improvement Association. (Janu– April 4, 1968), was one of the pivotal leaders of the American civil rights movement.” After attending Morehouse College in Atlanta, King went on to study at Crozer Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania and Boston University, where he deepened his understanding of theological scholarship and explored Mahatma Gandhi's nonviolent strategy for social change.